Re: [Evolution] Feature request: Making GPG signatures not look like attachments?

[Greg Macek <it-guy mrichi com>]

I'm not referencing inline PGP. This is directly related to the proper,
RFC standard. Agreed, it's doing its normal behavior, but it'd be cool
to have this exception. Do S/MIME certificates come as attachments? I
know this is forthcoming in the 2.0 series, but if so, I don't think
everyone will want to see that as an attachment for all email.

On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:52, Ted Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 22:33, Greg Macek wrote:
> > This may sound like a strange request and may not be possible, but I'll
> > ask. I have a bit of mail that has GPG signature on them, but no other
> > "regular" attachments
>
> (Let's see if I can beat guenther to this one)
>
> A search for "PGP inline" on
> http://www.mail-archive.com/evolution%40lists.ximian.com/ shows 52
> matches. The gist is that Evolution is doing what's right (ie, following
> standards) by including the sig as a MIME attachment while most other
> MUAs stick to the old way of PGP inline. I believe it's already been
> entered as a bug request in bugzilla.
-- 
Greg Macek | Senior IT Manager
Marketing Resources, Inc.

it-guy mrichi com | http://www.mrichi.com