On Sun, 2002-06-02 at 20:13, Ken Barber wrote:
On Thursday 30 May 2002 12:37 pm, Erik Bågfors wrote:
[Top-posting?]
Why not write it like this. After the part you are answering to and then removing everything else that you are not answering to. Writing it
[yes, but in mailing lists:] Most people reading a message will have just finished reading its antecedent and will already know to what it is replying. When combing through dozens or hundreds of messages
disagree. Many of the messages I read on mailing lists are replies to
older messages that I've read hours or days before - and I don't exactly
remember what the other msg said.
cheers
-- vbi
--
secure email with gpg avbidder fortytwo ch: key id 0x92082481
avbidder acter ch: key id 0x5E4B731F
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part