[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Evolution] Buglets in RC1 build (+cvs.2001.11.02.08.57) I've seen
- From: George Farris <george gmsys com>
- To: Evolution Mail List <evolution ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Buglets in RC1 build (+cvs.2001.11.02.08.57) I've seen
- Date: 02 Nov 2001 02:00:00 -0800
This is just plain wrong. Gnome-print should show the queues that are
on your machine so one can print with. One should almost never have to
type a queue name in. Many home users have more than one printer.
This small attention to detail is the stuff that makes the desktop nice
to use for average users. I mean what queue name do I type in??? No
one knows unless they know to look in /etc/printcap, just doesn't cut
it.
Imagine setting up GNOME on a corporate desktop, how does the secretary
find a different printer? Not by typing in a print queue name thats for
sure.
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 08:52, Mark Neill wrote:
>
> This is an lpr limitation. Typical home users aren't going to have
> multiple printer queues, they are going to have one default queue. No
> queue specification is necessary in this case.
>
> If a user is savvy enough to have set up multiple usable print queues, I
> expect they are savvy enough to append -Pqueuename to the lpr command to
> print to the non-default printer. But that's just my assumption
--
George Farris - VE7FRG
George gmsys com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]