Re: [Evolution] Evolution Bug Day, Take 2



On Tue, 2001-08-28 at 23:44, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 07:56:27PM -0400, Damon Chaplin wrote:

Outlook uses BYDAY=3FR for things like the above, which of course is a
good idea!

Oh yeah, that works :)

That leaves us with just 3 timezones which we still need the above
type of format for (Antarctica/Palmer, America/Godthab &
America/Santiago). I'll probably just try the multiple RRULE thing and
check that it works. (Strangely Outlook still uses the BYDAY=2SA type
of thing for these, so either their timezone data is wrong or ours is!)

Hmmm. I looked up America/Santiago and it was Sun 11 March and Sun 14 Oct
so this at least looks like BYDAY=2SU if anything. I couldn't find the
other two. I was looking at the following page.

http://www.timeanddate.com/time/dst2000a.html

I don't know where to find the rules for each country though. Do you
have any nice links?

We use the Olson timezone data, from ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/

Here's the relevant bits for Santiago. see zic(8) for the format.

Rule    Chile   1999    max     -       Oct     Sun>=9  4:00u   1:00    S
Rule    Chile   2000    max     -       Mar     Sun>=9  3:00u   0       -
# IATA SSIM anomalies: (1990-09) says 1990-09-16; (1992-02) says
1992-03-14;
# (1996-09) says 1998-03-08.  Ignore these.
# Zone  NAME            GMTOFF  RULES   FORMAT  [UNTIL]
Zone America/Santiago   -4:42:40 -      LMT     1890
                        -4:42:40 -      SMT     1910        # Santiago Mean Time
                        -5:00   Chile   CL%sT   1932 Sep    # Chile Time
                        -4:00   Chile   CL%sT


If it was 'Sun>=8' we could use BYDAY=2SU, but I don't know what we
can do with 'Sun>=9'.

Damon






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]