[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Evolution] Ximian vs. GNOME icons
- From: Andrew Smith <asmith wpequity com>
- To: Ben FrantzDale <bfrantzdale hmc edu>
- Cc: evolution ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Ximian vs. GNOME icons
- Date: 03 Aug 2001 15:38:56 -0400
I especially like the tigert icons. It would be a shame to see them go
unused. The evolution icons are a bit too "soft" for my liking. Almost
trending toward the mozilla modern theme.
-a.
On 03 Aug 2001 14:11:29 -0400, Ben FrantzDale wrote:
>
>
> As Evolution progresses I'm finding that the icons are drifting away
> from the stock GNOME icons. Furthermore the new icons seem to be
> adopting a different style.
>
> I recall that there may be plans to let themes define buttonbar icons.
> (Does anyone know the status of that idea?) Untill that happens, though,
> It seems that the Ximian icons, and thus Evolution is inconsistant with
> the rest of the GNOME desktop.
>
> Can anyone comment on this?
>
> Sincerely,
> Ben FrantzDale
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist - evolution ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]