On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 01:12 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote: > I discovered a bottleneck for addressbook performance with large > addressbooks. Details at > http://n800evolution.blogspot.com/2007/04/libebook-scalability.html > > A proposed fix is attached. I'm not sure if order matters when > returned from the backend? Does anyone know? If not, g_list_reverse > can be omitted. I also pushed a patch into bugzilla to do this, because eds-dbus has had that patch for a long time. You can omit the reverse as ordering from the backend isn't specified. Let me get dressed and so on and I'll file a bug with a set of similar optimisations in e-vcard (which, IIRC, is the biggest bottleneck once the server side book view optimisations landed). Ross -- Ross Burton mail: ross burtonini com jabber: ross burtonini com www: http://www.burtonini.com./ PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part