Re: [Ekiga-devel-list] Testing of bug 558587



>> >> I'm trying to get a decent backtrace with all the debuginfo stuff
>> >> installed. From my testing it seems that it happens even when a call
>> >> is rejected. It seems to affect what will become Fedora 10 quite badly
>> >> for some reason. I'm not sure whether we can make the cutoff for
>> >> packages with a fix which is Friday, but would love to get a zero day
>> >> update available.
>> >
>> > Are you sure it affects so many people ?
>> > I don't even see in which thread it crashes :(
>>
>> I setup a very simple asterisk box today with 2 extensions and
>> connected two ekiga endpoints to it. I ran ekiga in a gdb session and
>> collected a backtrack with a "thread apply all bt" so it should have
>> caught all needed with luck. Its attached to the bug. gdb complains
>> about not having some debuginfo packages installed but I think its
>> essentially listing everything in the gnome stack, I don't think i
>> have any of the important ones missing. If there is let me know as I
>> can now recreate this issue on demand.
>
> There is something very weird. A few developers and myself can not
> reproduce it at all...
>
> If you look at the crash, you can see this :
> #0  IA__g_type_check_instance_cast (type_instance=0x2,
> iface_type=11338368) at gtype.c:3723
> #1  0x000000000049eec4 in closed_cb (main_window=0x2) at gui/main.cpp:3644
>
> closed_cb takes only one argument, which is main_window and which has an invalid value.
>
> On my system, closed_cb is defined as this (with 2 arguments):
> static void
> closed_cb (NotifyNotification* /*notify*/,
>           gpointer main_window)
>
> My libnotify version is 0.4.4 and you ?

Same,  with a couple of patches from upstream. The one that looks like
it might be an issue has the change log entry "Handled extra parameter
of closed signal
" Patch can be seen here
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libnotify/F-10/libnotify-closed-reason.patch?view=markup

> PS/ for Fedora, you can release without libnotify support, if that's the problem...

Sure. Was thinking just a little while ago of removing it in the build
and testing from when you had mentioned it previously. What
functionality does it remove?

Peter

Peter


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]