Re: Dia for windows stability?

[avijit ghosh <avijit ghosh pfizer com>]

Hey thanks much I found the new one in the links below.. The new one works!
Its pretty zippy too.. (20 second loads so you have a sense of it on at 13
layer set ) Its probably a bit stupid to hide this all in layers when the
basic objects are really the same..   (just the attributes/values are
changing for each "layer"). It may be better to move to sorting out how the
python scripting works and hide the data in a file somewhere and use the
python script to modify the attributes / layers on each click. But
regardless this does work for now!

-regards,
-avi


On 3/23/09 11:32 AM, "Hans Breuer" <hans breuer org> wrote:

> At 23.03.2009 14:48, avijit ghosh wrote:
> [...]
>> http://dia-installer.de/index_en.html
>> 
>> 
>> (both the .94 version and the 0.96 version) seems to be extremely buggy for
>> some reason under Windows XP Pro SP2. Its buggy to the point that its not
>> really usable. I have tried this both natively and under vmware. The same
>> .dia files read/write perfectly fine on the fink/darwinports version of Mac
>> OS X, linux as well as the cygwinports windows version.
>> 
> There is a difference between being "extremly buggy" and e.g. producing the
> same output on all platforms. Which one are you complaining about?
> 
> Also is it a coincidence you are leaving out 0.95 - which was up until
> recently the one I'm using for diagramming work under windoze?
> 
> No matter of your definition of "extremly buggy" you may want to take a at
> Dia 0.97-pre2 - it is intended to be better in both cases ;)
> 
>>  I unfortunately don¹t have a MS compiler here but I¹d be willing to help
>> someone do someone do some debugging with regards to sorting out what
>> exactly is going on. Is there a newer version of this that is available?
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dia-list/2009-February/msg00057.html
> 
>> The
>> files I am generating are actually pretty complex (100 megs or so
>> compressed) and it may be tripping up against a bug somewhere..
>> 
> I never used a Diagram with more than about thousand objects - and even
> that was for pure testing purpose. Last time I did I've found e.g.
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562574
> 
> If your requirment is not a typo, I think you are stressing Dia far above
> its limits (millions of objects?). There are a few algoritms with n^2 or
> even worse which I would expect to make Dia with a lot of objects unuseable
> on Linux, too.
> 
> May I ask what use case requires a diagram which never can be read completely?
> 
> Hans
> 
> -------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
> Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
> get along without it.                -- Dilbert
> _______________________________________________
> dia-list mailing list
> dia-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
> FAQ at http://live.gnome.org/Dia/Faq
> Main page at http://live.gnome.org/Dia
>