[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: petal2dia?
- From: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777 yahoo com>
- To: dia-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: petal2dia?
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 05:20:06 -0800 (PST)
--- Andrew Marlow <apm35 student open ac uk> wrote:
> dia-list gnome org writes:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Is there a path for transitioning Rose models to dia/UML?
> >
> IMO this is impossible. The petal file is closed-secret-proprietary
> and
> even if it could be reserve engineered the format is subject to
> change
> without notice.
Fine. You are right, I have answered a differnt question.
Why Petal, why not XMI?
> I would much rather that there was a suitable open
> standard then RatRose and Dia could both conform to it. Unfortunately
> I
> don't think that XMI is quite good enough yet.
I don't know, personally I think XMI is *BAD*, but it would be good
enought for exchanging with ArgoUML.
> Other standards are
> currently being worked on.
Which ones? pray tell?
> In the meantime XML seems the best way to
> go to
> me, since it would then be possible to write XSLT translators when a
> standard is finally agreed on.
Well, XMI is a good example of a very hard to use XML format.
Mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus – Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]