Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v5)
- From: Shaun McCance <shaunm gnome org>
- To: Felipe Contreras <felipe contreras gmail com>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME user survey 2011 (v5)
- Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:04:18 -0400
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 23:38 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's the next version of the survey. Unfortunately, it seems this is
> not going to be blessed by GNOME, and questionpro.com only allows 10
> questions in the free version. I haven't found a better free online
> survey, and unless somebody offers hosting for this survey, it would
> have to be limited.
[snip]
> What about other kinds of bias? Would the survey be invalidated if we
> missed some group of people?
Please look up "non-response bias". It's been shown that, in some cases,
the group of respondents (and non-respondents) can be inherently biased.
It's reasonable to suspect that polarized opinions could affect people's
proclivity to respond.
You cannot even begin to deal with non-response bias unless you know the
non-response rate. And you have no idea what the non-response rate is if
you have an open-invitation survey on the Internet.
--
Shaun
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]