[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file

From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:23:33 +0100

ahoj,

Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2008, 20:06 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Pölsterl:
> I agree. Pulse looks really great. Why shouldn't we us it when it already
> exists?

i guess because it's still in the making.

andre
-- 
 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

References:
- Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Olav Vitters
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Paolo Borelli
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Olav Vitters
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Marko Anastasov
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Shaun McCance
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Wouter Bolsterlee
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Sebastian Pölsterl

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]