[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: This proposal doesn't imply extra work (was: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file)

From: "Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak" <mjc avtechpulse com>
Cc: gnome-infrastructure gnome org, desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: This proposal doesn't imply extra work (was: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file)
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:46:18 -0500

Sandy Armstrong wrote:

I think I'm part of the (so far) silent majority that doesn't care one
way or the other and will be glad to fill in whatever little file
helps the infrastructure team.

Ditto. DOAP might not be perfect, but we don't need perfect. "Waybetter" will do :-)


- Mike

Follow-Ups:
- Re: This proposal doesn't imply extra work (was: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file)
  - From: Wouter Bolsterlee

References:
- This proposal doesn't imply extra work (was: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file)
  - From: Olav Vitters
- Re: This proposal doesn't imply extra work (was: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file)
  - From: Sandy Armstrong

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]