Re: Adding more schema entries to libgnome ok?

[Matt Keenan <Matt Keenan Sun COM>]

Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 20:07 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
>   
> > Hi.
> >
> > I've got a few reports in bugzilla with patches to add more schema
> > entries in libgnome. Is it ok to keep adding API/ABI to these deprecated
> > libs or should we seek to put them elsewhere?
> >
> > I guess we'll have to migrate the whole lot to some other place at some
> > point anyway if we are to get rid of libgnome so adding a few more won't
> > add much to the burden.
> >
> > - lockdown: Restrict Application Launching, default schema ...
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395887
> >     
>
> This one seems pretty remote from what would actually be needed, and
> there's no patches for gnome-panel/nautilus to look at the
> implementation.
>
>   
There are patches in bugzilla for gnome-panel, nautilus and pessulus for 
these keys :
   gnome-panel : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394252
   nautilus : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397715
   pessulus : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394249

So not that remote i think....

Matt