On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 21:18 +0100, Toby Smithe wrote:
> I had a feeling this would be the case, and I doubted inclusion as soon
> as I sent off the e-mail. I don't want a Compiz clone, so I probably
> think that doing something new is the better approach. It's just that
> there is a working infrastructure there, and it's a pity to waste it.
Compiz is really more of a technology demo than a seriously credible
contender as a main window manager for either the GNOME or the KDE
projects. It has lots of pretty eye candy (though for me it's beyond
painfully slow), but it's not a particularly good window manager. You
don't have to use it for very long before you notice lots of little
details about "being a window manager" that it gets wrong.