Re: Proposing GtkUnique 1.0 as a blessed external dependency

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> This can be fixed before 1.0, but given the number and usage of symbols
> GtkUnique exports, I would expect them to be the same in case of
> inclusions inside GTK+.

When you submit the lib to gtk bugzilla, the gtk maintainers almost 
certainly will want some API changes. (Good reason to submit the API 
right away, btw.)

Even if they don't though, just as a practical matter you don't want two 
copies of the same symbol in one process, even if in theory they are 
cut-and-pastes of the same implementation.

Havoc