Re: When will mc-4.6.2 be released?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 14:25, Marcel Pol wrote:
|
|>A small problem that comes from that is that the utf8 patches are
|>developed against head now. There are a few rejects when applying to
|>current 4.6.1. Since I'm no C coder I'm not able to upgrade the Mandrake
|>package to current 4.6.1, and I'd rather not touch head.
|
|
| That is a very bad development. We want these patches to be used
| downstream for 4.6.1. For post 4.6.1 we hope to implement support for
| multibyte character sets by wrapping relevant functions.
|
| Jindrich, I have asked you repeatedly to revert from the use of HEAD for
| the pre 4.6.1 releases. Please, please, please could you use a PRE
| tarball for the development rpms for Fedora Core and Red Hat Enterprise
| Linux? I've put a lot of effort to get these patches from Red Hat (Jakub
| Jelinek) and SuSE (Vladimir Nadvornik) synchronized and I would hate it
| to see that effort wasted. Thanks.

I'm sorry, it turns out I was partly wrong here. The devel tree for
Fedora4 has a package from cvs head, while updates for Fedora3 hold a
4.6.1-pre3 package with an utf8 patch that applies cleanly against it.
Sorry for any confusion.


- --
Marcel Pol


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCDgJnMgeuL0xhZZ4RAkcsAJ4uR0Ko9BQGO5jjSLZB53EokygC+ACeJpcd
K4Bq2ElBG7Yx3uWxZYSiKys=
=rQiX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]