Pardon my intrusion. On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:35:28AM +0200, Ali Akcaagac wrote: > On Tuesday 09 April 2002 00:48, Pavel Roskin wrote: <...> > > glib 2.0 requires pkgconfig. It's a C program, so it's another > > prerequirements to the users who want to compile MC from sources, > > especially on traditional UNIX systems without any version of pkgconfig > > and glib. Alone the requirement for glib causes much pain for UNIX users. > > thanks for underestimating me and my capabilities.. i know howto use > a compiler and my brain and i am not using linux since yesterday, its > a couple of years that i use it now. Great Ali, if you know C aswell you can make a difference. Please have a look yourself at supporting both glib 1.2 and 2.0. > by the way... and as respectfull i want to sound now.... you should > be a tad more diplomatic to people while answering, this wouldnt waste > your time in writing the mail and not wasting or hurting the people > that needs to read them. my previous sentence was easy enought to > understand. Please don't be easily offended. I read Pavels message as a standard statement of objectives. It would be a problem for AIX/msdos/OS2/whatever-ports with an extra requirement on pkgconfig so porting mc to glib 2.0 would perhaps not be such a good idea but I'm all for adding support for glib 2.0 if it doesn't mangle the source too much. -- //Björnen. bjorn bjornen nu | http://bjornen.nu
Attachment:
pgpK1QW57MfHI.pgp
Description: PGP signature