GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #403 - 5 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 110605] Changed - Gtk::Widget::modify_fg/bg can't take a 0 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 109966] Changed - Dispatcher does not work on win32 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 110605] Changed - Gtk::Widget::modify_fg/bg can't take a 0 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 109826] Changed - new rpm spec file (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 109828] Changed - rpm spec files (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, olau hardworking dk
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 02:52:15 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 110605] Changed - Gtk::Widget::modify_fg/bg can't take a 0

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110605

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/110605	Tue Apr 15 17:09:17 2003
+++ shadow/110605.tmp.3729	Wed Apr 16 02:52:15 2003
@@ -75,6 +75,10 @@
 Perhaps we could persuade Daniel to look at it?
 
 ------- Additional Comments From olau hardworking dk  2003-04-15 17:09 -------
 Created an attachment (id=15752)
 Patch that adds unset_* and custom documentation to modify_*
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-16 02:52 -------
+That looks great. Please apply to gtkmm 2.4. Please do add a "//TODO: 
+Document this" comment next to modify_bg_pixmap().



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, cgustin ibelgique com
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:54:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109966] Changed - Dispatcher does not work on win32

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109966

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/109966	Tue Apr 15 04:21:01 2003
+++ shadow/109966.tmp.29371	Wed Apr 16 12:54:56 2003
@@ -9,12 +9,13 @@
 Priority: Normal
 Component: general
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: cgustin ibelgique com               
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
+Cc: daniel elstner gmx net
 Summary: Dispatcher does not work on win32
 
 Glib::Dispatcher builds fine on win32 using mingw32 but the 
 examples/thread/dispatcher and dispatcher2 examples do not work.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-04-04 06:51 -------
@@ -50,6 +51,15 @@
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From andrew solvo ru  2003-04-15 04:21 -------
 Created an attachment (id=15730)
 fixed lock for prev patch
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-16 12:54 -------
+Great. Even though it still doesn't mean much to me, that's a lot
+better. However, I don't know what "btw" means - maybe that could be
+changed?
+
+It seems like this is ready for Daniel to look at it. Daniel?
+
+



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:11:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 110605] Changed - Gtk::Widget::modify_fg/bg can't take a 0

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110605

Changed by olau hardworking dk 

--- shadow/110605	Wed Apr 16 02:52:15 2003
+++ shadow/110605.tmp.5365	Wed Apr 16 16:11:24 2003
@@ -79,6 +79,9 @@
 Patch that adds unset_* and custom documentation to modify_*
 
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-16 02:52 -------
 That looks great. Please apply to gtkmm 2.4. Please do add a "//TODO: 
 Document this" comment next to modify_bg_pixmap().
+
+------- Additional Comments From olau hardworking dk  2003-04-16 16:11 -------
+OK, done.



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gbpeck sbcglobal net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:53:49 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109826] Changed - new rpm spec file

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109826

Changed by gbpeck sbcglobal net 

--- shadow/109826	Sun Apr 13 09:03:06 2003
+++ shadow/109826.tmp.22753	Wed Apr 16 19:53:48 2003
@@ -87,6 +87,41 @@
 number variables (e.g. of glib) from configure.in, like in the .pc.in
 file. This would mean you don't have to keep changing the numbers
 manually.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-13 09:03 -------
 Are you likely to revise this patch?
+
+------- Additional Comments From gbpeck sbcglobal net  2003-04-16 19:53 -------
+> > it adds significantly to the compile
+> > time
+> 
+> Which isn't very relevant to the issue of rpms.
+
+True, but gtkmm takes long enough to compile as it is :) My main
+complaint, however, is that it breaks the build. The time is not that
+big of a deal.
+
+> > and, most importantly, it doesn't always compile (at least in
+> > 2.2.1),
+> 
+> So report/fix the bugs.
+
+Usually I do. However, I don't track the development of gtkmm, nor am
+I familiar with the API. I just package it because I use applications
+that require it.
+
+> This can not be applied yet. The Makefile.am patch has nothing to do 
+> with the rpm spec file. Also, you might consider using the version
+> number variables (e.g. of glib) from configure.in, like in the
+> .pc.in file. This would mean you don't have to keep changing the 
+> numbers manually.
+
+I'll take out the Makefile.am patch since you said that building the
+examples was intended. Just be warned that the examples in 2.2.1 don't
+build cleanly (at least on my machine). I'll file a bug report when I
+have a chance. Also, I'll look at using variables from configure.in.
+
+> Are you likely to revise this patch?
+
+Yeah. I've been busy at work with a project deadline. I'll send a new
+patch once that passes.



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gbpeck sbcglobal net
Cc: 
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:57:17 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109828] Changed - rpm spec files

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109828

Changed by gbpeck sbcglobal net 

--- shadow/109828	Fri Apr  4 01:45:04 2003
+++ shadow/109828.tmp.24035	Wed Apr 16 19:57:17 2003
@@ -179,6 +179,12 @@
 No, please save us time by providing patches that I can just mark as
 ready to apply.
 
 
 
         
+
+------- Additional Comments From gbpeck sbcglobal net  2003-04-16 19:57 -------
+> No, please save us time by providing patches that I can just mark
+> as ready to apply.
+
+Fine. Will do when I have a chance.




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]