> Finally, as far as I remember the history, original democratic voting > system in Greece *was not* anonymous. And not everyone was allowed > to vote (you had to own land in the town in order to participate in > voting). > People who did have right to vote were repsonsible for their > descisions > by property and land they own. And at the end by their lives too. As a side note, the original democratic system in Greece was not democratic at all as we define it today. Most population was not enough of a person to vote, for instance. I add my voice to the anonymous process. The undemocratic reactions some people might have, that might influence people that have less self confidence or that may be vulnerable in some way to the pressure made by others, is the reason the democratic process is anonymous. If one is afraid of anonymous vote between people of good intentions as those found in GNOME, then why isn't one afraid of the democratic elections his your country (supposing there is such a thing)? It's much more important than these elections and you don't see people pushing for 'raise-your-hands' vote :) Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part