[Planner Dev] Bugs in the undo system: Report to reach 0.12



Hi guys!

This morning I have tried to fill bugs for all the pending work in the
undo stuff. The undo implementation is complete but we need to give more
love to it, as usual. The bugs I can detect about the undo system are:

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129139: General bug. Close it!

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140695: Undo resource dialog.
Done. Close it!

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140697: Undo task view. Done.
Close it!

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141120: Resource usage probs when
certain undo operations.

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141594: Calendar undo. Close it as
soon as I commit the last changes.

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141967: Undo for task and resource
custom properties. I think it is finished. Can we close it?

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143609: Undo details for custom
properties. Is it finished?

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144732: When the user in one
action do several things (removing several tasks) we create several undo
commands. Ideally, we need to create only one. This could be post 0.12.

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144733: We create undo operations
in cases where values don't really change. This could be post 0.12.

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144734: Some work to be done in
cleaning up the code.

I plan to work in 144734 from this bugs, that I think it could be great
to have it closed before 0.12 release, but not critical.

Here goes a bug that has been detected working with undo:

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144731: arrows survive when a
subtask with predecessors are removed.

This is a bug we have found also in the past in other context

http://bugs.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141346

Maybe it is better to reopen 141346 and close 144731 because they are
the same bug.

I think this bug is the more important, maybe with resource usage
problems, in order to release 0.12.

Cheers

-- Alvaro

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]