Re: irc summary
- From: Tom Vogt <tom lemuria org>
- To: gnome-gui-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: irc summary
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 20:16:02 +0200
Dan Kaminsky <effugas@best.com> wrote:
> ><lonelyT> look, what i'm seeing here is a generic "let's set a standard but
> be
> >flexible about it" why don't we dispense with the rest of these questions,
> >since they all amount to the same thing.
>
> LonelyT hated the meeting more than you can imagine.
doesn't matter. he said a couple of interesting things and that's all that
counts.
> 4) Remove any Linux-centricity from the documentation. We're not just for
> Linux. :-)
agreed.
> Lets not forget, this was a conference that brought a new batch of people up
> to speed on the happenings of GNOME. In two weeks, the UISG will have quite
> a bit more to show, and much more for the public to comment upon.
you're moving slow there. two weeks and "a bit more" ? this list is
already going into details for some points, I hope you guys don't get left
behind.
> My stuff...lesse, runbox, keybox/keythemes, screenplays, macro recording on
> the library level(I've come to agree with the Xlab guy here), collaborative
> applications, the minbar, and explaining the motivation behind all actions
> as well as rebutting counterarguments...there, harvest all of 'em and
> anything else I forgot :-)
screenplays are in as a c5 point. other than that I only put stuff in that
was discussed on the list, because I want to have heard at least three
opinions on it.
> Can we agree to dump C1 through C5? It's just *too* confusing, man...
is it? you're the first to say that, if memory serves correctly.
go to sleep. maybe it's less confusing afterwards. :)
--
The universe does not have laws -- it has habits, and habits can be broken.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]