Re: [xslt] [PATCH] new crypto namespace and hash functions forlibexslt

[Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>]

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 17:03 -0400, joel reed wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 01:00:12PM +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 10:36 -0400, joel reed wrote:
> > > the attached patch
> > 
> > No patch attached. :-)
> 
> every time i try to send it i get:
> 
> Your mail to 'xslt' with the subject
>  
> Re: [xslt] [PATCH] new crypto namespace and hash functions for libexslt 
>                                                                                        
> Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. 
>  
> The reason it is being held: 
>  
>     Message has a suspicious header 
>  
> Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive 
> notification of the moderator's decision. 

Sounds like a problem with the MIME header your mailer is putting on the
patch attachment (or adding to the mail in total as a result of it being
a multipart message). Can you see what headers are being appended.
Normally the outgoing mail would be multipart/mixed as the Content-Type
for the mail and the patch attachment would most likely have a
Content-Type of text/plain.

Very mysterious, since you are using mutt, so it should Just Work(tm).

Malcolm