Re: [xslt] bug in xsl:processing-instruction?
- From: Guillaume SMET <guillaume_ml smet org>
- To: xslt gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xslt] bug in xsl:processing-instruction?
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:18:28 +0200
Hi,
In fact, the output should even be :
<?php
echo $date;
?>
It's far better not to use short open tags because you can configure php
to ignore them (short_open_tag off in the php.ini), especially when you
use XML.
HTH
G.
Pierre François wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I use the following xsl statement for producing html code with
> xsltproc:
>
> <xsl:processing-instruction name="php">
> echo $date;
> </xsl:processing-instruction>
>
> I get the following output:
>
> <?
> echo $date;
> >
>
> I'm missing the '?' before the closing '>'. I fix it by putting
>
> //?</xsl:processing-instruction>
>
> instead of </xsl:processing-instruction>, but I wonder if this is not a
> bug of xsltproc. Does anybody know why it behaves in such a way?
>
> Regards.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]