Re: [xslt] Windows build
- From: "William M. Brack" <wbrack mmm com hk>
- To: <xslt gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xslt] Windows build
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:47:12 +0800 (HKT)
Igor,
I truly envy your knowledge and experience with Windoze (someday
you must tell me how you have immunized yourself against all those
viruses....), but on a number of occassions you have made mention
of compilation times, always stressing how Windoze is fast and
Linux is slow, e.g.
> Number 2 has increased the build time, that is clear. However, as
> expected, it is still needs less time to build on Windows than it
> needs on Linux. I therefore consider the build time more than
> acceptable.
Could you give me some idea of what are the times you are
experiencing, and why you would "expect" them to be faster than on
Linux? I have never attempted subjecting libxml2 to the Windoze
compiling experience, but for Linux I get:
billrouter libxml2-2.4.24 # make distclean > /dev/null 2>&1
billrouter libxml2-2.4.24 # date;./configure>/dev/null
2>&1;date;make>/dev/null 2>&1;date
Mon Sep 30 23:40:37 HKT 2002
Mon Sep 30 23:40:46 HKT 2002
Mon Sep 30 23:42:18 HKT 2002
billrouter libxml2-2.4.24 #
i.e. 9 seconds to configure, 1 minute 32 seconds to compile & test
both static and dynamic libraries (latest utilities, gcc 3.1.1).
Bill
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]