Re: [xslt] is xsltproc really this fast?

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:09:37PM -0500, Tom Moog wrote:
> 
> The non-validating piccolo sax parser (written in java) is
> very nearly as fast as expat (once the jit has warmed up).
> expat claims to be the fastest C/C++ sax parser available
> (although it does have high initialization cost).

  Hum, Matt Sergeat reported once it was faster to parse with libxml2
to get a DOM tree then walk the DOM tree to generate SAX even than have
expat generate the events directly, so I doubt this claim is (was) founded !

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/