RE: [xml] RE: [xslt] small fix needed for win32




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@redhat.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 7:56 AM

>   I'm tempted by an intermediate approach:
>     - all source shipped as part of the distribution do 
> #include "libxml.h"
>       or "libxslt.h"
>     - the files which are actually part of that library explicitely
>       have #define IN_LIBXML before including it
>     - the #define IN_LIBXML is removed from the header itself.

Likewise for IN_LIBXSLT and IN_LIBEXSLT? And yes, this sounds ok to me.
Of course, with automake 1.5 or above its easy in the Makefiles :].
 

> P.S. I assume the last release didn't worked "out of the box" 
> anyway since
>      the new c14n module was added and I didn't integrated 
> any patch from
>      you about this ;-)

I haven't released new cygwin binaries, so you will get a patch when I
do..

Rob



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]