Re: [xslt] [PATCH] Updated cygwin support patch

["Robert Collins" <robert collins itdomain com au>]

Probably, but it will 'work' for now. I'm inclined to fix things as they
come to notice :}.

Long term I've some plans for gcc to make this _really_ work, but that
is some time away.

Rob

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Igor Zlatkovic" <izlatkovic@daenet.de>
> However, we _can_ remove it from the function prototypes and have
> current binutils auto-resolve it. It does involve that PE
> specification
> violation I mentioned, but it will work. (It won't remove the need
> for -DLIBEXSLT_STATIC though).

Does that mean that the best for Cygwin would be to have LIBXXX_PUBLIC
decorating every public function prototype, throughout the library? In
all three libraries? I have nothing against this, I am used to it, all
of my portable code here has such prototypes. However, I think that Unix
developers would not exactly welcome this, and they are a great majority
around libxml.

Ciao
Igor

_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
xslt@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt