Re: [xslt] Re: Obscure bug?

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

  I just did, same here and I think I know where the bug is, I hope
to have it killed soon :-)

  Note: in general resending an issue after one week if there was no
        answer might be a good idea, I do skip mail sometimes :-\

Daniel

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:23:40PM +0100, Gary Benson wrote:
> Did anyone ever try this? 
> 
> Cheers, Gary
> 
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Gary Benson wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I originally posted this to xml-bindings but got no response so I'm
> > reposting it here.  I think I found a very obscure bug in which
> > extension functions are not recognised within {} XPath syntax if the
> > stylesheet was imported into another stylesheet via xsl:import.  The
> > attached file broken-ext2func.py exercises the bug on my system:
> > 
> > | $ ./broken-ext2func.py 
> > | xmlXPathCompOpEval: function foo bound to undefined prefix foo
> > | Unexpected root property content, extension function failed
> > 
> > The file broken-ext2func-workaround.py contains the workaround that I am
> > currently using:
> > 
> > | $ ./broken-ext2func-workaround.py 
> > | OK
> > 
> > Can anyone else verify that they are seeing this?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Gary
> > 
> > [ gary@inauspicious.org ][ GnuPG 85A8F78B ][ http://inauspicious.org/ ]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
> xslt@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/