Re: [xml-bindings]Parameter passing convention in extension functions ...
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: rm fabula de
- Cc: xml-bindings gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml-bindings]Parameter passing convention in extension functions ...
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:53:57 -0400
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 07:44:38PM +0200, rm fabula de wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 01:04:44PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > Patch commited in CVS, and enclosed, could you check it fixed it ?
> >
>
> Ok, i just checked out the code from CVS and compile it. I'll post the results.
okay, except the anonymous CVS is probably 1 day late, you may need to apply
the patch anyway.
> >
> > > As another question: when i call <xsl:value-of select='foo:bar(.)' />
> > > what is the type of the parameter. A call print in python emits
> > > '[<PyCObject object at 0x8189770>]' which doesn't seem to help a lot.
> > > Is there any way to work on/with such a parameter from within python?
> >
> > That's a problem that Norm Walsh faced too and I didn't managed to
> > find the problem in a 15mn debugging session, seems I really need to focuse
> > on this one, could you bugzilla it ?
>
> Well, what is _supposed_ to come in?
The mapping of an XPath nodeset, i.e. a python array of
xmlNode instances (Python ones).
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]