Re: extended WM_TRANSIENT_FOR (was Re: _NET: Disabling shading)
- From: Lubos Lunak <l lunak suse cz>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: extended WM_TRANSIENT_FOR (was Re: _NET: Disabling shading)
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:40:20 +0200
On Tuesday 07 of October 2003 00:07, Gregory Merchan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:54:45PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
[snip]
> >
> > An example of a case I have problem with is a cookie dialog ("do you
> > want to accept this cookie from site XYZ?"). Cookies are not handled
> > by Konqueror itself, but a special kcookiejar daemon handles them in
> > one place. As it's a separate process, WM_CLASS, window_group and
> > similar don't work. ...
>
> Why not?
>
> Processes are mostly irrelevant at the X server because the clients may
> come from different machines and multiple clients may come from the same
> process.
>
> A single client could implement multiple applications and so its windows
> would have different WM_CLASS.res_class hints. Likewise, multiple clients
> could implement a single application, so their WM_CLASS hints would be
> the same. The important thing is that the hint is set to provide the
> window manager what data it needs.
>
> The ICCCM explicitly identifies the WM_HINTS.window_group hint as
> potentially grouping windows from different clients.
> http://tronche.com/gui/x/icccm/sec-4.html#s-4.1.11
That's an interesting idea, I didn't think about it this way (most probably
because from the API side this will be ugly). I can give it a try and see.
--
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: l lunak suse cz , l lunak kde org
Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]