Re: No focus on map hint II.



Looks good to me.

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 03:34, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> On Thursday 15 of May 2003 15:38, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> >  First, the hint that started this all. The only thing I added when
> > compared to the last proposal is that clients should also update the user
> > time in the hint in the visible window, so that the WM is able to detect
> > last user activity in the window if key events don't propagate up to the
> > frame. I also think the name MAP_TIMESTAMP no longer fits, so I suggest
> > _NET_WM_USER_TIME as the name of the property.
> >
> > The patch is attached as user_time.txt . I'd like this one to get in the
> > spec. (I added the note about CARDINAL[] because I use it in code, and it
> > would break code that would strictly request the property to contain only
> > one CARDINAL value - any complaints about that?).
> 
>  Could somebody please say something about this specific part? Qt needs to be 
> patches for this, and since it involves some kind of new API, it needs to get 
> in before Qt-3.2 final, otherwise they probably won't accept it before 3.3.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]