Re: Applications and layers
- From: Billy Biggs <vektor dumbterm net>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Applications and layers
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 06:29:51 -0500
As a followup to myself, I just noticed that the _WIN_LAYER
docs I was looking at were from the GNOME window manager compliance
pages. Is this obsolete or replaced by the ABOVE and BELOW and
fullscreen states?
Thanks,
-Billy
Billy Biggs (vektor dumbterm net):
> I've had a user request for more explicit layer modes in my
> application, and I'd like some comments from this list:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=744951&group_id=64301&atid=506987
>
> I'm curious about the intended application behavior for setting
> _WIN_LAYER and also _NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE/STATE_BELOW.
>
> My thought is that I should not allow these as options to the user,
> but rather use them as tools for implementing specific features. This
> user seems to want to have enough command line and run time options to
> roll their own application modes. Is this the role of the application,
> or the window manager? Is it intended that every application have some
> -layer option to indicate which layer they should start on?
>
> Also, is _NET_WM_STATE_ABOVE the same as the "ONTOP" layer? In KWin,
> I set always-on-top from a menu in the title bar, and that seems more
> appropriate to me. I could see this also for below. If that's true,
> then I could remember the layer across sessions and I think that would
> be safe, and that might be a good practical use of the _WIN_LAYER hint.
>
> Finally, I've been doing some running-on-the-root-window code, and I'm
> wondering how this relates to WIN_LAYER_DESKTOP. Should I be setting my
> window to that layer if I'm 'running on the root'? Also, KDE has its
> own window for the desktop, will using WIN_LAYER_DESKTOP make sure I'm
> above that, or could my window get stuck behind that? Maybe this is
> worthy of another thread.
>
> Thanks,
> -Billy
>
> _______________________________________________
> wm-spec-list mailing list
> wm-spec-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]