Re: User-level Tasks in Hotplug Scripts?
- From: 520047054719-0001 t-online de (Oliver Neukum)
- To: jg pa dec com (Jim Gettys)
- Cc: jg pa dec com (Jim Gettys), David Brownell <david-b pacbell net>, Ryan Shaw <ryan shaw stanfordalumni org>, linux-hotplug-devel lists sourceforge net, wm-spec-list gnome org, xpert xfree86 org, 520047054719-0001 t-online de (Oliver Neukum)
- Subject: Re: User-level Tasks in Hotplug Scripts?
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 23:52:32 +0100
> > Is there anything wrong with the simplistic approach of having a demon
> > listening on a socket? If you want it generic, you have to use generic
> > means of communication.
>
> You don't want to pass out permission to access your X server to anyone
> who happens to ask for it (if you do, you've compromized everything,
> or go down into compartmentalized workstation hell, someplace where we
> went 10 years ago and found fundamentally painful).
> So the issue is fundamentally one of authenticating
> the configuration GUI's process to the X server to allow connection.
There's no reason the listening demon has to be part of X, or is there ?
An interrested user would start a task listening upon login.
Regards
Oliver
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]