Re: Application launch detection
- From: raster rasterman com
- To: astrand lysator liu se
- Cc: rik kde org, hp redhat com, xdg-list freedesktop org, wm-spec-list gnome org, jirka 5z com
- Subject: Re: Application launch detection
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 12:32:02 -0800 (PST)
On 10 Nov, Peter Astrand scribbled:
->
-> > for app-starting indication. Each of these methods were checked into
-> > the KDE CVS and given thorough testing.
-> >
-> > Using the feedback I got, I settled on our current system.
-> >
-> > Here's a description of the steps I went through. This might be
->
-> I agree with most of your conclusions. Just some small comments:
->
-> > By adding a few simple lines to KApplication's code (which is
-> > called by all KDE applications) I was able to set _NET_WM_PID.
-> > Any process can look at newly mapped windows, so it was easy
-> > to check for _NET_WM_PID.
->
-> One must be careful when checking for atoms on newly created windows, if
-> the property is not set on all windows. If an application:
->
-> 1) Creates an subwindow to the root window
-> 2) Creates several subwindows to this window
-> 3) Finally sets some atom on the last window
->
-> ...it's not possible to reliable detect the property. Why? Because we have
-> to do XSelectInput on the subwindows, but new subwindows can be created
-> before we do XSelectInput. There is a note about this problem in the
-> xtoolwait(1) sourcecode.
->
-> So, either apps should set the property on all windows or the first one
-> (eg. it's enough to do XSelectInput on the root window.
oh - dont check on creation - only check on map - created windows if
not mapped should be left alone by any "tool wait" program or wm or
whatever - only mapped windows (or windows that have a WM_STATE
property on them - ie window could be iconified)
-> > I would have liked a perfect system, but unfortunately we can't
-> > control how people write their applications.
->
-> True. But we can control Xlib, sort of, and it means an solution that
-> works with all apps. That is the only reason why I'm hanging on to the
-> Xlib/LD_PRELOAD approaches...
controlling xlib either via an Ld_PRELOAD hack or via having a modified
Xlib or getting this modification into xfree86/X source is the most
desireable course of action - havingto wait for everyone to go
implimentit is not so desireable.
--
--------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) raster rasterman com raster valinux com
raster enlightenment org raster linux com
raster zip com au
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]