Criteria for 1.0

[julian adams <julian adams gmx net>]

I've been looking at the changes from 1.0pre3 as much as I've had time too, 
and they look really excellent. The only thing I've noticed is that the 
(incomplete) UTF-8 reference that I put in there has not been fixed. For 
the record UTF-8 is RFC 2279 AFAIK. This at least should go in (and I guess 
I've volunteering for that).

I think we should consider that the spec is absolutely in feature freeze, 
apart from fixes to showstoppers.

It would be great if the KDE guys could see if the post KDE2.0 revisions 
will cause any issues. I know we've been over this about a million times, 
and it's hard to concentrate on sonething that's basically the same, but it 
would be helpful to discover any gotcha's in advance. I'm not sure that we 
should alter the spec for this, but it would be helpful to put it out with 
attached notes discussing issues.

Over and above that I think we're ready to go 1.0.

Thoughts ?

Julian