Re: Comments on 1.0pre3/pre4



>
> _NET_WM_ICON_NAME ? It has been proposed, why isn't it included ?  Maybe
> this
> has been neglected since most of the stuff addressed by the spec kind of
>
> assumes that no icons are displayed.
>
>

I've seen this proposed a few times, but have never seem much feedback on
it. I think it's just pure oversight, and should go in.





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]