Re: Application modal transients windows
- From: Matthias Ettrich <ettrich troll no>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Application modal transients windows
- Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 21:34:17 +0100
On Fri, 05 Nov 1999, raster@rasterman.com wrote:
> On 5 Nov, Matthias Ettrich scribbled:
> -> >
> -> > anyone got insight into this? i think it's good we have a debate on
> -> > this now, rather than leave it half-done and end up with a standard
> -> > several of us may think is inadequate
> -> >
> ->
> -> I agree with Raster here. A rgba datastream to store the icon has several
> -> advantages. It's a little bit more complicated for simple window managers
> -> to handle (but hey, who can't handle rgb data?) but it won't slow things down.
> ->
> -> What's happening currently (at least with KWM ) is:
>
> you missed the:
> - the app creates pixmap - waits for server reply
> - the app creates Ximage or XShmImage (in shm this means
> another server to and fro to negotiate shm segment)
> - the app converts image data of disk or memory to Ximage
> - the app XPut/XShmPutImage's the data
we missed even more. one pixmap isn't sufficient at all. Most applications
define two, a data pixmap and a mask (=> even more roundtrips).
Obviously an argb datastream in the ONE BIG net property on each client window
is the way to go :)
Matthias
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]