Re: 1.9d
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: wm-spec-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 1.9d
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 08:35:32 +0100 (CET)
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Michael ROGERS wrote:
> >also the 0xFFFFFFFF is superfluous (besides obviously hackish), this is
> >exactly what _NET_WM_STATE_STICKY is meant to indicate.
>
> Not true - 'sticky' indicates that the window should not move when moving the
> viewport. 'Desktop 0xffffffff' indicates that the window should appear on all
> desktops.
so you want to distinguish between viewport-scrollable sticky windows and screen
sticky windows? can you give an example where this is actually usefull?
and why don't we have _NET_WM_STATE_STICKY and _NET_WM_STATE_SCROLLABLE_STICKY
to indicate this then (with one state taking precedence over the other)?
(_NET_WM_DESKTOP is still the wrong place for this, since for both sticky
behaviours, _NET_WM_DESKTOP is a meaningless property).
>
> Michael
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]