Re: [Usability] Requesting mini-UI review for Epiphany toolbar patch
- From: Joachim Noreiko <jnoreiko yahoo com>
- To: Reinout van Schouwen <reinouts gnome org>, usability gnome org, epiphany-list gnome org, Calum Benson sun com
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Requesting mini-UI review for Epiphany toolbar patch
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:17:30 +0000 (GMT)
--- Reinout van Schouwen <reinouts gnome org> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> A new way of showing/hiding individual toolbars was
> introduced in this
> release cycle of Epiphany. We've found that the UI
> for this still has some
> rough edges that we would like to polish, but
> because we're in UI and
> string freeze, the release and i18n teams have
> requested that we get an UI
> review this Monday to approve of the changes.
>
> The full rationale behind this request can be found
> in this thread:
>
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2006-February/msg00220.html
>
> The patch, along with before/after screenshots is
> available here:
> http://home.exetel.com.au/harvey/epiphany/toolbar/
>
> We're hoping that the UI team will agree that these
> changes, or at
> least some of them, are worthwile.
Both the before and after versions of the View ->
Toolbars menu are inconsistent.
If a 'Show...' item has a tick, then it's something
that is currently visible, and I untick to hide it.
When it's hidden, the tick is gone and the menu item
text is the same, 'Show....'.
But the main control (the after version) seems to be a
menu toggle, where if it's hidden the text reads
'Show...' and if it's visible, the text reads
'Hide...'.
You're mixing two types of menu control here.
I would put 'Show Toolbars' at the top of the submenu,
and when it is unticked, grey out the individual items
beneath it but keep their ticks.
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]