Re: [Usability]Re: Notification area (was: Music player UI)
- From: Per Cederberg <per percederberg net>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]Re: Notification area (was: Music player UI)
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 02:31:44 +0100
Jeff Waugh wrote:
The few good ones (volume control, as an example) could either continue
to be exposed, or made into status icons (the status of my volume).
Go back and rewrite the sentence using the correct terminology, and see if
it makes sense, ie. swap 'status' for 'notification'. Now compare the Mac OS
X volume control and the Windows volume control.
What do you mean? Do Windows and Mac OS X behave good or bad?
We don't need to remove applets altogether - we need to improve how they
operate and define where they're relevant, and make sure the notification
area is used as it was designed. Then we can avoid the mistakes other
platforms have made in this area.
So the notification area is only to be used for notifications
(I assume). But what exactly is a "notification"? Is temporary
existence the criteria? Or is it that the system adds and
removes icons as it see fit?
I'm not convinced that there is a relevant distinction between
my volume control icon and the (now suggested) media player
icon. Is the current CPU usage a "status" or "notification"
icon? How about the current system time? Are there some good
examples that you can point me to, so that the distinction
becomes clearer?
/Per - who saw the notification area for the first time today
----
Per Cederberg
http://www.percederberg.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]