[Usability] HIG and MDI/SDI/Tabs
- From: Mike <mike redtux demon co uk>
- To: "usability gnome org" <usability gnome org>
- Subject: [Usability] HIG and MDI/SDI/Tabs
- Date: 31 Aug 2003 00:51:35 +0100
Following a discussion on epiphany, I've just realised that the HIG
mandates against the use of tabs/MDI
I feel that it is a mistake to mandate this for all apps.
Personally I would have the following criteria
1. Apps where a user would typically have several documents/pages open
at the same time during a session.
This would include text editors, word-processors, web-browsers
IMO the best usabilty would be a default of MDI/Tab interface.
Reason - far easier to switch between different documents.
Personally the three examples I can say that use this approach are
gedit, epiphany and gnome-terminal and I think it works well. I would
like abiword and gnumeric to behave the same way to avoid cluttering my
screen/taskbar. (grouping is not really a solution and an extra click)
2. Documents that have differing views available such as edit, preview,
old, new
This I would see as SDI with multiple tabs so you can switch between
views easily
3. Applications which typically are worked on one or maybe two
instances in a session
This would include pdf viewers, image viewers, archive extractors
SDI would be the simplest approach.
4. Applications where it is natural to have more than one window visible
simultaneously eg:nautilus
SDI multiple instances.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]