Re: [Usability] Linux Desktop Usability Report
- From: Alan Horkan <horkana maths tcd ie>
- To: David Adam Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Linux Desktop Usability Report
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:59:37 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, David Adam Bordoley wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:32:15 -0400
> From: David Adam Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>
> To: usability gnome org
> Cc: horkana maths tcd ie
> Subject: Re: [Usability] Linux Desktop Usability Report
>
> alan wrote:
> > I will use this opportunity to mention the term "Druid" as the most
> > unpleasant piece of wording I can think of in the entire Gnome desktop.
> > It overstretches an already weak metaphor (Wizard), at least the AutoPilot
> > terminology used by OpenOffice is far more likely to be understood by
> > users unfamiliar with computers even though it does also suffer the
> > inconsistancy disadvantage.
>
> I'm fairly certain the HIG recommends using the term "Assistant."
So it does:
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/draft_hig_new/windows-assistant.html
I definately need to sit down and read the HIG from start to finish, I
have read most of it but never all of it.
Now to actually get people to start using the term instead of Druid.
Thanks.
Sincerely
Alan Horkan
http://advogato.org/person/AlanHorkan/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]