Re: [Usability]Some UI review bugs filed



I'm not going to add it, because the bugs in the meta-bug and with the
ui-review keyword are for issues that have been discussed in a ui-review
on IRC. AFAICT, this hasn't. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed,
but just that it hasn't been addressed in a 2.1.x ui-review.

(If it came up on IRC, and everybody decided in 10s that the change
should be made, then adding keywords and adding it to the meta bug would
then make sense.)

What I'm trying to say is it's not a free-for-all "vote your favourite
usability bug" session, but rather a list of usability bugs that have
been discussed.

On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 20:48, MArk Finlay wrote:
> I would like to see this bug included:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96350
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 19:24, Andrew Sobala wrote:
> > OK, most of what came up in UI reviews have been filed in bugzilla. This
> > means a few things:
> > 
> > 1. I do not take any responsibility for anything accidentally missed.
> > Things consciously missed are:
> > 
> > - Panel menu: more separators (more constructive advice needed for
> > bugzilla)
> > - Panel menu: "Home folder" (not sure if panel or nautilus is doing this
> > "wrong")
> > - Network servers looks out of place (no advice about where to put it)
> > - s/Log Out/Log Out.../ (word "possibly" was used)
> > - "Death to Drawers." (uh huh :-) )
> > 
> > 2. Meta bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98898. You can
> > see all the 2.1.x UI review bugs at
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=98898. All new
> > UI-review bugs should really be set as blocking this one.
> > 
> > 3. Should usability-maint bugzilla gnome org be added to all UI review
> > bugs? I didn't want to spam them, but I will batch-add this alias if you
> > want.
> > 
> > 4. If opinions change, you need to add the comment to the relevant bug.
> > Bugs don't change automatically based on the consensus of this list.
> > 
> > 5. Good work guys!
-- 
Andrew Sobala <andrew sobala net>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]