[Usability]Tree sidebar (was: Re: Nautilus bugs and design choices (back-button))
- From: Reinout van Schouwen <reinout cs vu nl>
- To: Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de>
- Cc: "nautilus-list gnome org" <nautilus-list gnome org>, "desktop-devel-list gnome org" <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, "usability gnome org" <usability gnome org>
- Subject: [Usability]Tree sidebar (was: Re: Nautilus bugs and design choices (back-button))
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 00:00:04 +0200 (CEST)
Hi Mathias,
> > Not if you extend the functionality of the tree side panel to have
> > incremental search capacity (with or without an accompanying textfield).
> > Then the advanced user can still go where he wants with a few keystrokes.
> 1) You'd have to get all those magic URL schemas supported
> gnome-vfs (applications: , preferences:, whatever:) into the
hmm, I didn't take this into account, my idea was limited to incrementally
searching the visible contents of the tree. Entering all kinds of URLs is
a bit out of scope for that.
> 2) How do I reach sites in the web with such a tree?
I guess you don't, for all the reasons you listed. There could be an "Open
URL" dialog though, like many browsers have. (Ctrl+O iirc)
> 3) Of course you tree will support copy'n'paste -- but who'll come
> to the mad idea of pasting text into your tree view? It's
> definitly not a text area.
No, that would definately not be a good idea. In fact I don't see the
point of copying & pasting within a tree; at least not when the dragging
functionality is properly implemented with auto-scrolling when the list is
too long, etc.
> 4) An entry field in a sidebar will be pretty small and so it
> will be damn hard to read/to edit.
Agreed, therefore I don't think an entry field should be visible in the
sidebar at all times. If one would be used then I would be in favor of one
that would dynamically appear when the incremental-search-hotkey-combo is
pressed and disappear when the user has selected an item (and/or after a
certain amount of time).
> to -- and well: If the GUIs designed by their UI gurus just are
> inconvenient, unusable for a good number of (maybe I have to add
I agree that CDE is clunky and inconvenient, but it wasn't designed by Sun
alone (GNOME isn't either).
bye,
--
Reinout van Schouwen Artificial Intelligence student
email: reinout cs vu nl mobile phone: +31-6-44360778
GPG public key http://www.cs.vu.nl/~reinout/reinout.asc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]