[Usability]Re: Should the HIG advise use of Check and Radio menu items?
- From: Michael Toomim <toomim uclink4 berkeley edu>
- To: Usability gnome org
- Subject: [Usability]Re: Should the HIG advise use of Check and Radio menu items?
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:33:44 -0800
Gregory Merchan wrote:
They solve one problem: in most themes, including the default theme,
an untoggled radio or check menu item can not be distinguished from
a normal menu item.
Is this really an issue? Here's the current version of gnome-terminal's
"view" menu before selecting any of the boolean items:
----------------
| View |
|----------------|
| Hide Menubar |
| Fullscreen |
----------------
Here's what it would look like with checkboxes instead of mutating
menu-items:
----------------
| View |
|----------------|
| Hide Menubar |
| Fullscreen |
----------------
It's exactly the same! You can't say that there's a problem with the
checkmarks being invisible when unselected, because it's exactly the
same as the non-checkmark technique! When unselected, the 'Fullscreen'
item makes the window fullscreen; it really doesn't matter if there's a
checkmark next to it or not.
So I don't think it's a good idea to file that bug with GTK+.
The only difference (and thus the real argument) is between the
"selected" cases.
Here's the current version of gnome-terminal's view menu after selecting
"fullscreen":
-----------------------
| View |
|-----------------------|
| Hide Menubar |
| Restore Normal Size |
-----------------------
Here's what it would look like if it used check boxes.
----------------
| View |
|----------------|
| Hide Menubar |
|X Fullscreen |
----------------
Of these two, I happen to prefer the latter. The reason: Say I hit
fullscreen, and then want to go back and change it -- I'll be looking
for a menu-item that says "Fullscreen", since that's what I hit
originally. If you change the names of items on the menu, it makes the
UI hard to predict and hard to keep track of. This isn't a huge issue,
but it seems like a potentially valid point. Does anyone know any other
issues with either technique?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]