[Usability] Re: The endless and mostly fruitless GNOME applets debate [contd...]
- From: jacob berkman <jacob ximian com>
- To: Chema Celorio <chema ximian com>
- Cc: glynn foster ireland sun com, gnome-hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>, usability gnome org
- Subject: [Usability] Re: The endless and mostly fruitless GNOME applets debate [contd...]
- Date: 20 Sep 2001 11:58:20 -0400
On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 11:50, Chema Celorio wrote:
> On 20 Sep 2001 09:57:24 -0400, jacob berkman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2001-09-20 at 07:17, Glynn Foster wrote:
> > > Okay,
> > >
> > > So we have always reached an impasse in the past about what to do with
> > > GNOME applets ie. how to politely say to the author of an applet that
> > > it's crap and has no place in the main distribution.
> > i would be for disbanding gnome-applets in its entirety, and shipping
> > the applets in separate packages.
> I second jacob here, I am interested in particular with each applet
> having it's own release schedule. Also, getting the code and compiling
> it is easier when you only have one applet.
> We can have a "umbrella" module that pulls from CVS all the applets for
> those who prefer to have one package.
no - this would be very crack-rock. i don't know where to begin
debunking this, but as you didn't provide any reasons *for* it i won't
post any against.
"It drains me, and it shakes me, and hurts like hell everytime I play
it, looking out at thousands of people cheering and smiling, oblivious
to the tragedy of it's meaning, like when you're going to have your
dog put down and it's wagging it's tail on the way there." - Thom Yorke
] [Thread Prev