Re: GNOME 2.0 must-fix list Volunteers?
- From: Kevin Vandersloot <kfv101 psu edu>
- To: nils <n p sun com>
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME 2.0 must-fix list Volunteers?
- Date: 11 Aug 2001 18:34:58 -0400
Sign me up! I am willing to help out on any of 1,3,5, or 6. How about
putting me down for 6 and I'll help you out on 1 for now.
Is the idea is to do the RFP thingy for the proposals?
Also I might add a
9) gtk+
default theme
widget usability
any other usablility issues
or do most people feel that gtk is in good shape usablility wise (some
day I will be able to spell usability properly)? I can think of lots of
little things regarding gtk that would be simple patches (like making
the minimum scrollbar size a little larger).
Regards,
Kevin
On 11 Aug 2001 11:15:53 -0600, nils wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I think we should assign people responible for various
> aspects of the GNOME desktop. I have prposed some
> names. The people assigned to the project should come
> up with proposals for the usability must do/fixes.
>
> So what have I missed out - anybody want to voluteer?
>
> Nils
>
> -------------
>
>
> 1) Menus and Applications (Nils +??)
> Application menus (foot and foobar)
> Menu Panel Editing
> Initial Panel(s) and Applets (gadgets)
> Icons
> Application Launch Feedback
> Taskbar and generic application switching, manipulating
>
> 2) Nautilus (Seth??)
> Inital view
> Desktop background
> Desktop Icons
> Virtual (non filesystem) views?
>
> 3) Control Center and Meta Themer (??)
>
> 4) Evolution (Anna - Ximian?)
>
> 5) Default Window Manager Settings
> Theme
> Window Commands
> Graphic Design
>
> 6) Logging In and Out (??)
> Halt
> Reboot
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]