[Setup-tool-hackers] Re: Shipping Vera with 2.4
- From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
- To: Mikael Hallendal <micke codefactory se>
- Cc: Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk>, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>, Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GST <setup-tool-hackers ximian com>
- Subject: [Setup-tool-hackers] Re: Shipping Vera with 2.4
- Date: 28 Feb 2003 18:11:06 -0500
Hello,
> > Onthe other hand, language binding to a large variety of languages for CORBA exist
> > now, it is well known and understood technology while d-bus is for the most part
> > really a ugly IPC hack. Even if CORBA is not the appropriate ipc mrthof for some
> > case, that still doesn't mean inventing yet another ipc protocol makes any kind of
> > sence. Plenty already do exist, and there is complete lack of evidence the world
> > needs a new one.
>
> Did your travels take you to Goa or something? Have you even looked at
> D-BUS or are you just trolling?
I always wanted to have a Bus system in Gnome (I told so to Preston
Brown when we met in Boston a few years ago, something inspired on dcop
at the time).
But this new bus system re-implemented a lot of good existing
technology: a new rpc system (which is line-based, with base-64 encoding
required for all arguments to the simple commands) and has its own data
encoding system.
The data encoding system is a super set of GConf. Basic types, plus
arrays of types. There is no consideration for complex data types
(which really is not that much work on top of this, but I can see why
people wanted to keep it small).
The sizes of a non-1.0 project like dbus (dbus 0.4 here) are a bit
surprising for something which is supposed to be very small:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 miguel miguel 8532 Feb 28 17:34 libdbus-glib-1.so.0.0.0*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 miguel miguel 146012 Feb 28 17:34 libdbus-1.so.0.0.0*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 miguel miguel 17232 Feb 28 17:35 libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 miguel miguel 241600 Feb 28 17:35 libORBit-2.so.0*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 miguel miguel 69836 Feb 28 17:36 libbonobo-activation.so.4*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 miguel miguel 4036 Feb 28 18:06 libORBitutil.so.0.5.17*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 miguel miguel 28136 Feb 28 18:03 liblinc.so.1.0.0*
Comparing the mature orbit/cosnaming/bonobo-activation/linc vs the size
of the still non-1.0 dbus is interesting. The total sizes for
unstripped libraries are:
Orbit family: 360,840
d-bus family: 154,544
So it is almost half the size of our CORBA implementation at this
point. If things keep growing, I could see it matching the size of
ORBit.
A bus-like system should not be too hard to build with CORBA, and a
decent glib-like API layered on top of it to hide the complexity should
not be hard either (gconf is a proof of a simple API being creatable for
this purpose.
(Also: there is already a more general bus-like system in CORBA called
the event service, but people might want something as thin as possible).
Anyways, my 2 cents.
Miguel.
_______________________________________________
setup-tool-hackers maillist - setup-tool-hackers@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/setup-tool-hackers
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]