[Setup-tool-hackers] Re: Shipping Vera with 2.4
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>, GST <setup-tool-hackers ximian com>
- Subject: [Setup-tool-hackers] Re: Shipping Vera with 2.4
- Date: 27 Feb 2003 11:31:37 +0000
On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 10:58, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 05:38, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > As a tangent, IMO many of our current end-user-impacting issues are
> > going to require working outside of GNOME in order to address
> > them. There are many issues about hardware, system configuration,
> Will many of these issues *require* not working with other vendors? cf.
> the ximian-setup-tools - "pinch the icons and pointlessly re-write it in
> based on an inferior model" job.
> What is it about eg. GUI system tools, that require working outside of
> Gnome ? yes - it's given that setup tools are system specific, and
> vendor/version dependent - but sharing core code inside a sensible and
> flexible structure can never be a bad thing - surely ?
> As for making GNOME into an entire operating system - there's a straw
> man if ever one saw one. Simply looking for sensible areas of
> re-applicability for various technologies is great: glib has a use
> outside GNOME - so does gtk+, so does ORBit2.
> How does eg. having standardized GUI tools across distributions with a
> sane structure make GNOME an "operating system" ?
> One of the things that amazes me about D/BUS is that - having been
> patronizingly lectured extensively in the past about how "a string is an
> API" - it seems that D/BUS is essentially a "send a string" transport.
> Is there really no formal contract specification language ? and/or
> suggestions for and/or descriptions of such ? I couldn't find such a
> thing in the documentation. You're going to need IDL - hey, you could
> even compile that IDL to some typesafe stubs / skels !
The problem with using CORBA is that, for simple things like what d-bus
would be used for, CORBA is overkill, overengineered and heavy.
Take a look at the amount of code one would need to write to get a
simple IPC between to sessions of one app, with CORBA and dbus.
#2 0x4205a2cc in printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity) from
/lib/i686/libc.so.6 printf ("Oh my %s\n", preferred_deity);
setup-tool-hackers maillist - email@example.com
] [Thread Prev