[Rhythmbox-devel] Rhythmbox 0.9.4 and current CVS crash at start up
- From: "Christophe Dehais" <christophe dehais gmail com>
- To: rhythmbox-devel <rhythmbox-devel gnome org>
- Subject: [Rhythmbox-devel] Rhythmbox 0.9.4 and current CVS crash at start up
- Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 13:37:37 +0200
Here are my compilation options:
--enable-daap --enable-tag-writing --enable-track-transfer --enable-python --enable-libnotify --enable-musicbrainz --with-mdns=avahi --with-rhythmdb-debug=2 --disable-lirc --with-dbus
gtk+ is version 2.8.16
gstreamer is version 0.10.4
dbus is version 0.61
I run on debian testing where rhythmbox 0.9.3 is ok except a crash when trying to launch 2 instances of rhythmbox.
I tested on 2 different systems with debian testing, same crash for both.
I have those messages before rhythmbox segfaults:
----------
(rhythmbox:19241): Rhythmbox-WARNING **: couldn't connect to session bus: Unable to determine the address of the message bus
(rhythmbox:19241): Rhythmbox-WARNING **: Unable to load icon rhythmbox-tray-icon
(rhythmbox:19241): Rhythmbox-WARNING **: Unable to load icon rhythmbox-set-star
(rhythmbox:19241): Rhythmbox-WARNING **: Unable to load icon rhythmbox-unset-star
(rhythmbox:19241): Rhythmbox-WARNING **: Unable to load icon rhythmbox-podcast
(rhythmbox:19241): Rhythmbox-WARNING **: Unable to load icon rhythmbox-no-star
(rhythmbox:19241): Rhythmbox-WARNING **: Unable to load icon media-eject
(rhythmbox:19241): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_file_get_contents: assertion `filename != NULL' failed
(rhythmbox:19241): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_box_pack_start: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (child)' failed
(rhythmbox:19241): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_box_reorder_child: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (child)' failed
(rhythmbox:19241): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_box_pack_start: assertion `GTK_IS_WIDGET (child)' failed
(rhythmbox:19241): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_toolbar_insert: assertion `GTK_IS_TOOLBAR (toolbar)' failed
(rhythmbox:19241): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_toolbar_insert: assertion `GTK_IS_TOOLBAR (toolbar)' failed
-------------------
hum, btw compiling with default options leads to the same behaviour.
Even if it doesn't seem critical nor closely related, the first warning about dbus seems strange to me. Maybe I didn't set up dbus correctly on my system(s).
Christophe.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]